Socio-political feasibility of coal energy phase-out and its function in mitigation pathways

Hendryx, M. et al. Impacts of coal use on well being. Annu. Rev. Publ. Well being 41, 397–415 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Spencer, T. et al. The 1.5 °C goal and coal sector transition: on the limits of societal feasibility. Clim. Coverage 18, 335–351 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

World Power Balances 2019: Abstract Power Balances (IEA, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5257/iea/net/2019

Clarke, L. et al. in Local weather Change 2014: Mitigation of Local weather Change. Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Evaluation Report (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

Gilabert, P. & Lawford-Smith, H. Political feasibility: a conceptual exploration. Polit. Stud. 60, 809–825 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Geels, F. W. Regime resistance in opposition to low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and energy into the multi-level perspective. Theor. Cult. Soc. 31, 21–40 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Wilson, C. & Grubler, A. Classes from the historical past of technological change for clear power situations and insurance policies. Nat. Resour. Discussion board 35, 165–184 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Johnson, N. et al. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: implications of local weather coverage for the phase-out of coal-based energy crops. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 89–102 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Seto, Okay. C. et al. Carbon lock-in: varieties, causes, and coverage implications. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 425–452 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Unruh, G. C. Understanding carbon lock-in. Power Pol. 28, 817–830 (2000).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Loftus, P. J. et al. A essential assessment of worldwide decarbonization situations: what do they inform us about feasibility? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 6, 93–112 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

van Sluisveld, M. A. E. et al. Evaluating future patterns of power system change in 2 °C situations with traditionally noticed charges of change. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 436–449 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Napp, T. et al. Exploring the feasibility of low-carbon situations utilizing historic power transitions evaluation. Energies 10, 116 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Vinichenko, V. et al. Historic precedents and feasibility of fast coal and fuel decline required for the 1.5 °C goal. One Earth 4, 1477–1490 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Jewell, J. & Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of local weather change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to maintain warming beneath 1.5C? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 11, 621 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Jewell, J. et al. Prospects for powering previous coal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 592–597 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Le Quéré, C. et al. Drivers of declining CO₂ emissions in 18 developed economies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 213–217 (2019).

Mehta, U. S. et al. In Pursuit of a Low Fossil Power Future: Interrogating Social, Political and Financial Drivers and Boundaries in India’s Power Transition (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017); https://www.fes-asia.org/information/in-pursuit-of-a-low-fossil-energy-future/

Lamb, W. F. & Minx, J. C. The political economic system of nationwide local weather coverage: architectures of constraint and a typology of nations. Power Res. Soc. Sci. 64, 101429 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Grübler, A. et al. Dynamics of power applied sciences and world change. Power Coverage 27, 247–280 (1999).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Grubler, A. Power transitions analysis: insights and cautionary tales. Power Coverage 50, 8–16 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Geels, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Coverage 31, 1257–1274 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

The Finish of Coal is in Sight (Powering Previous Coal Alliance, 2022); https://poweringpastcoal.org/

Fleurbaey, M. et al. in Local weather Change 2014: Mitigation of Local weather Change. Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Evaluation Report (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

Arbelaez, J. P. & Marzolf, N. C. Energy & Risk: The Power Sector in Jamaica (InterAmerican Growth Financial institution, 2010); https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/doc/Energy-and-Risk-The-Power-Sector-in-Jamaica.pdf

Keppo, I. et al. Exploring the chance house: taking inventory of the varied capabilities and gaps in built-in evaluation fashions. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 053006 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Pye, S. et al. Modelling ‘Leadership-Driven’ Situations of the World Mitigation Effort (UCL Power Institute, 2019); https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/modelling-leadership-driven-scenarios-of-theglobal-mitigation-effort-ucl-energy-institute/

Bi, S. et al. Dynamic analysis of coverage feasibility, feedbacks and the ambitions of COALitions. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-827021/v1 (2023).

van Beek, L. et al. Anticipating futures via fashions: the rise of Built-in Evaluation Modelling within the local weather science-policy interface since 1970. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102191 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Local weather Change Minister Claire Perry Launches Powering Previous Coal Alliance at COP23 (PPCA, 2017); https://www.poweringpastcoal.org/information/PPCA-news/Powering-Previous-Coal-Alliance-launched-COP23

Blondeel, M. et al. Shifting past coal: exploring and explaining the Powering Previous Coal Alliance. Power Res. Soc. Sci. 59, 101304 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Low, S. & Schäfer, S. Is bio-energy carbon seize and storage (BECCS) possible? The contested authority of built-in evaluation modeling. Power Res. Soc. Sci. 60, 101326 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Grant, N. et al. The coverage implications of an unsure carbon dioxide removing potential. Joule 5, 2593–2605 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Iyer, G. Diffusion of low-carbon applied sciences and the feasibility of long-term local weather targets. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 103–118 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gambhir, A. et al. Assessing the feasibility of worldwide long-term mitigation situations. Energies 10, 89 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Li, F. G. N. & McDowall, W. Transparency and high quality in modelling power transitions. In Proc. eighth Worldwide Sustainability Transitions Convention (IST 2017) (Chalmers College of Know-how, CIIST and STRN, 2017); https://www5.shocklogic.com/scripts/jmevent/programme.php?client_Id=KONGRESS&project_Id=17361

Keepin, B. & Wynne, B. Technical evaluation of IIASA power situations. Nature 312, 691–695 (1984).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Patterson, J. J. et al. Political feasibility of 1.5˚C societal transformations: the function of social justice. Curr. Opin. Environ. Maintain. 31, 1–9 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dooley, Okay. et al. Co-producing local weather coverage and damaging emissions: trade-offs for sustainable land-use. Glob. Maintain. 1, e3 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ellenbeck, S. & Lilliestam, J. How modelers assemble power prices: discursive components in Power System and Built-in Evaluation Fashions. Power Res. Soc. Sci. 47, 69–77 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Stoddard, I. et al. Three many years of local weather mitigation: why haven’t we bent the worldwide emissions curve? Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 653–689 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

DeCarolis, J. et al. Formalizing greatest observe for power system optimization modelling. Appl. Power 194, 184–198 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

World coal to wash energy transition assertion. In UN Local weather Change Convention UK 2021 (COP26) (UK Authorities and United Nations Local weather Change, 2021); https://ukcop26.org/global-coal-to-clean-power-transition-statement/

Welsby, D. et al. Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world. Nature 597, 230–234 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Erickson, P. et al. Why fossil gasoline producer subsidies matter. Nature 578, E1–E4 (2020).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Biomass in a Low-Carbon Economic system (CCC, 2018); https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/biomass-in-a-low-carbon-economy/

Huppmann, D., Rogelj, J., Kriegler, E., Krey, V. & Riahi, Okay. A brand new state of affairs useful resource for built-in 1.5 °C analysis. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 1027–1030 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Fuss, S. et al. Adverse emissions—half 2: prices, potentials and unwanted side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Creutzig, F. et al. Bioenergy and local weather change mitigation: an evaluation. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 7, 916–944 (2015).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Built-in Evaluation of World Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0: Mannequin Description and Coverage Functions (PBL, 2014); https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/integrated-assessment-of-global-environmental-change-with-IMAGE-3.0

Fricko, O. et al. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road state of affairs for the twenty first century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 251–267 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Rogelj, J. et al. Situations in direction of limiting world imply temperature enhance beneath 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 325–332 (2018).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Marchetti, C. & Nakicenovic, N. The Dynamics of Power Methods and the Logistic Substitution Mannequin (IIASA, 1979); http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/1024/

IPCC. Particular Report on World Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

Muttitt, G., Value, J., Pye, S. & Welsby, D. Mannequin and outcomes information from socio-political feasibility of coal energy phaseout and its function in mitigation pathways. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7313951 (2022).

The Built-in MARKAL-EFOM System (TIMES) – a bottom-up optimization mannequin for energy-environment programs. GitHub https://github.com/etsap-TIMES/TIMES_model (2022).